[Mesa-dev] Missing integer "set" opcodes in Gallium
bryancain3 at gmail.com
Mon Aug 29 22:02:05 PDT 2011
On 08/29/2011 03:41 PM, Zack Rusin wrote:
> On Monday, August 29, 2011 04:02:08 PM Zack Rusin wrote:
>> Either way though if GL needs those ops then, like Brian mentioned, it'd be
>> a good idea to add them.
> Actually I think it seems easier to just flip the ops rather than add new
> instructions, i.e. change stuff like a > b, to b < a, and a <= b to b >= a.
> Just an opinion though, I don't have strong preferences here.
You're right; that's an easier solution. That way, the only opcode I'll
need to add is UARL.
More information about the mesa-dev