[Mesa-dev] dri/nouveau: Fix build with --enable-shared-dricore.

Sedat Dilek sedat.dilek at googlemail.com
Fri Jun 3 03:34:10 PDT 2011


On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Johannes Obermayr
<johannesobermayr at gmx.de> wrote:
> Am Friday, 3. June 2011, 03:48:39 schrieb Sedat Dilek:
>> From [1]:
>>
>> --- a/configure.ac
>> +++ b/configure.ac
>> @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ dnl Versions for external dependencies
>> LIBDRM_REQUIRED=2.4.24
>> LIBDRM_RADEON_REQUIRED=2.4.24
>> LIBDRM_INTEL_REQUIRED=2.4.24
>> +LIBDRM_NOUVEAU_REQUIRED=0.6
>> ...
>>
>> 0.6?
>>
>
> $ cat /usr/lib64/pkgconfig/libdrm_nouveau.pc | grep Version
> Version: 0.6
>
> Isn't it right?
>

AFAICS the (minimum) version of mesa/drm (libdrm) is required here (see [1]).
Dunno much about nouveau and its requirements.

- Sedat -

P.S.:
The patch management for mesa (dri-devel) could be indeed a bit
improved/revised (regarding your FDO Bug 35441).
Some (trivial) patches of mine got lost or resent months (one even
years) later by someone else and finally got accepted.
Also, I remind some "a candidate for 7.10" were not committed to
7.10-git branch.
My patchset (IIRC from January) to remove driver and core date from
kernel-drm and libdrm simply was ignored.
FYI: From mesa(-git) driver-date was removed a few months back.
No answer off-hand how to do things more effectively, but I am
"...with you in spirit" (from Hybris shooter-game on Amiga).

[1] http://cgit.freedesktop.org/mesa/drm

>> - Sedat -
>>
>> [1]
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/commit/?id=873379a8818eed9ab16c2472
> 8b7091a3a3705c5b
>


More information about the mesa-dev mailing list