[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 2/2] i965: handle gl_PointCoord for Gen4 and Gen5 platform

[Yuanhan Liu]

On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 11:59:17AM -0800, Eric Anholt wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 13:31:33 +0800, Liu Aleaxander <aleaxander at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 8:54 AM, Eric Anholt <eric at anholt.net> wrote:
> > > On Sat, 18 Feb 2012 23:07:32 +0800, Liu Aleaxander <aleaxander at gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> +   /*
> > >> +    * gl_PointCoord is a FS instead of VS builtin variable, thus is not
> > >> +    * included in c->nr_setup_regs. But FS need SF do the interpolation,
> > >> +    * so that here padding the interpolation for gl_PointCoord in last.
> > >> +    */
> > >> +   if (c->key.do_point_coord)
> > >> +      c->nr_setup_regs++;
> > >
> > > So you're writing an extra attribute of setup, but you haven't increased
> > > the size of the URB entry.  If the URB full except for pointcoord, you'd
> > > end up writing over the next URB entry and probably hanging the GPU.  If
> > > you correctly allocate the URB size and that gets reflected in
> > > urb_read_length, you should be able to read your new attribute.
> > 
> > That's maybe the place I don't understand quite well so far. Say, you
> > write attributes into URB from SF thread to FS. I did increase the
> > urb_read_length in wm_state. Is that the allocation you mean? Should
> > I, say, allocate size for extra attributes just for FS in SF stage? If
> > so, would you please tell me how? Since if I understand correctly, the
> > urb_read_length in SF_STATE is counted from the attributes from VF
> > stage. Thus at least urb_read_length in SF stage is not the right
> > place for me to touch, right?
> 
> urb_entry_size in the SF is the size of what the SF outputs and is what
> determines how much space is allocated by brw_urb.c

Thanks for the info.

Well, I was trying to figure out why this patch doesn't work when the
urb read lenght per each attribute is set to 2 at calculate_urb_setup(),
but it does work when set to 4. I may not quite understand the urb
layout now; and I'm trying to figure it out.

Thanks,
Yuanhan Liu