[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 01/12] R600/structurizer: add class to find the Nearest Common Dominator

Michel Dänzer michel at daenzer.net
Thu Feb 21 01:27:05 PST 2013


On Mit, 2013-02-20 at 17:56 +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote: 
> On Don, 2013-02-14 at 11:32 +0100, Christian König wrote: 
> > Am 13.02.2013 18:22, schrieb Michel Dänzer:
> > > On Mit, 2013-02-13 at 18:17 +0100, Christian König wrote:
> > >> Am 13.02.2013 18:11, schrieb Michel Dänzer:
> > >>> On Mit, 2013-02-13 at 11:34 -0500, Tom Stellard wrote:
> > >>>> There's just the one cleanup on patch 10 that you mentioned, but
> > >>>> otherwise the series looks good to me.  Should we mark all these patches
> > >>>> as candidates for the stable branch?
> > >>> I think so, at least the parts which prevent things such as Vincent's
> > >>> MAD changes or switching to the Source scheduler from breaking stuff.
> > >> I still have no idea why the MAD change actually breaks anything. I'm
> > >> working on OMOD/ABS/NEG folding in another branch and have Vincents MAD
> > >> in there, but I haven't had time to fully figure out what's wrong there.
> > >> And unfortunately I don't think I will have time in the near future.
> > > Well, as I said, his MAD changes no longer break after this series. Does
> > > anything speak against backporting the whole series to the stable tree?
> > 
> > Oh, didn't know that I actually had fixed the bug that made MAD break, 
> > good to know.
> 
> Actually, today I'm seeing the MAD changes breaking some piglit tests
> again even with your changes.

Never mind, your cndlt fix takes care of it. Let's hope for good this
time. :)


-- 
Earthling Michel Dänzer           |                   http://www.amd.com
Libre software enthusiast         |          Debian, X and DRI developer


More information about the mesa-dev mailing list