[Mesa-dev] [PATCH] nir/lower_vec_to_movs: Better report channels handled by insert_mov

Matt Turner mattst88 at gmail.com
Wed Feb 10 21:47:12 UTC 2016


On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 1:27 PM, Jason Ekstrand <jason at jlekstrand.net> wrote:
> This fixes two issues.  First, we had a use-after-free in the case where
> the instruction got deleted and we tried to return mov->dest.write_mask.
> Second, in the case where we are doing a self-mov of a register, we delete
> those channels that are moved to themselves from the write-mask.  This
> means that those channels aren't reported as being handled even though they
> are.  We now stash off the write-mask before remove unneeded channels so
> that they still get reported as handled.
>
> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94073
> ---
>  src/compiler/nir/nir_lower_vec_to_movs.c | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/compiler/nir/nir_lower_vec_to_movs.c b/src/compiler/nir/nir_lower_vec_to_movs.c
> index 06d6279..f51cede 100644
> --- a/src/compiler/nir/nir_lower_vec_to_movs.c
> +++ b/src/compiler/nir/nir_lower_vec_to_movs.c
> @@ -83,6 +83,8 @@ insert_mov(nir_alu_instr *vec, unsigned start_idx, nir_shader *shader)
>        }
>     }
>
> +   unsigned channels_handled = mov->dest.write_mask;
> +
>     /* In some situations (if the vecN is involved in a phi-web), we can end
>      * up with a mov from a register to itself.  Some of those channels may end
>      * up doing nothing and there's no reason to have them as part of the mov.
> @@ -103,7 +105,7 @@ insert_mov(nir_alu_instr *vec, unsigned start_idx, nir_shader *shader)
>        ralloc_free(mov);
>     }
>
> -   return mov->dest.write_mask;
> +   return channels_handled;
>  }

Yup. I totally missed the very obvious use-after-free in 8dcbca5.

Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <mattst88 at gmail.com>

I'd tag this for stable as well since it fixes a WebGL conformance test.


More information about the mesa-dev mailing list