[Mesa-dev] change 396cbab, configs with accumulation buffer

Marek Olšák maraeo at gmail.com
Mon Feb 22 13:01:53 UTC 2016


On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 1:48 PM, Tapani Pälli <tapani.palli at intel.com> wrote:
>
> On 02/22/2016 02:27 PM, Marek Olšák wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 1:10 PM, Tapani Pälli <tapani.palli at intel.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 02/22/2016 02:01 PM, Marek Olšák wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 7:06 AM, Tapani Pälli <tapani.palli at intel.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Marek;
>>>>>
>>>>> Was this commit fixing some issues/problems? Why would we not expose
>>>>> configs
>>>>> with accumulation buffer?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> EGL doesn't support accumulation buffers.
>>>>
>>>
>>> So EGL would not expose such capability. Couldn't it then expose those
>>> configs without any harm done?
>>
>>
>> Why? Those configs are useless and redundant.
>>
>
> It looks that I don't fully understand the issue here, I never used
> accumulation buffers and most likely never will but what I wanted to
> understand is that can these configs still be used without accumulation
> buffer being ended up used at all? This is probably what happens as without
> this change everything works just fine, no issues.
>
> If the end effect is that things work same way with or without the patch we
> could consider reverting the change? If not, then I will just state to these
> guys that they will need to live with a patch in their tree.

I suggest they try to find out what the real issue is instead of
working around it.

Marek


More information about the mesa-dev mailing list