[Mesa-dev] Patchwork review process (efficiency) questions

[⚛]

On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 6:32 PM, Patrick Baggett
<baggett.patrick at gmail.com> wrote:
> While I agree with the principle of what you're saying (the process
> can be improved, etc.), being extremely sarcastic and condescending is
> not the best way to effect change.

Can you please point out which part of the *1st* message in this forum
thread is sarcastic and condescending?

General rule: If it cannot be pointed out then it doesn't exist.

Clarification: The 1st message in this forum thread is
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-dev/2016-June/119332.html

Thanks.

> It's pretty clear you're getting
> negative reactions to your responses due to non-technical reasons and
> for some, the conversation is over before it started. It seems like a
> silly reason to have what could be potentially a useful conversation
> halted. Ultimately, you're still dealing with people, love it or hate
> it.
>
> Is your real aim here to have an efficient patch reviewing process?
> Then be pragmatic, and not just about your content, but also the
> "metacontent": connotations and style when you present and discuss it.
> Otherwise, it doesn't matter if you're wrong, right, have a point, or
> not: you will not be heard.