[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 02/13] intel/blorp: Assert on gen7 fast-cleared subresource

Nanley Chery nanleychery at gmail.com
Tue Jun 20 21:43:23 UTC 2017


On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 04:06:34PM -0700, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 11:41 AM, Nanley Chery <nanleychery at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
> > Signed-off-by: Nanley Chery <nanley.g.chery at intel.com>
> > ---
> >  src/intel/blorp/blorp_clear.c | 4 ++++
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/src/intel/blorp/blorp_clear.c b/src/intel/blorp/blorp_clear.c
> > index 3d5c41cc71..f43d05ad19 100644
> > --- a/src/intel/blorp/blorp_clear.c
> > +++ b/src/intel/blorp/blorp_clear.c
> > @@ -308,6 +308,10 @@ blorp_fast_clear(struct blorp_batch *batch,
> >                   uint32_t level, uint32_t start_layer, uint32_t
> > num_layers,
> >                   uint32_t x0, uint32_t y0, uint32_t x1, uint32_t y1)
> >  {
> > +   /* Multi-layer and multi-LOD fast clear is only available gen8+. */
> > +   assert(ISL_DEV_GEN(batch->blorp->isl_dev) >= 8 ||
> > +          (level == 0 && start_layer + num_layers == 1));
> >
> 
> Alternatively, you could just add code to patch 1 which asserts that the
> level/layer is in-bounds for the auxiliary surface if one exists.
> 
> 

I think your suggestion complements, but doesn't replace this patch.
Your suggestion validates the level and start_layer parameters. This
patch validates those parameters as well as the num_layers parameter.

> > +
> >     struct blorp_params params;
> >     blorp_params_init(&params);
> >     params.num_layers = num_layers;
> > --
> > 2.13.1
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > mesa-dev mailing list
> > mesa-dev at lists.freedesktop.org
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
> >


More information about the mesa-dev mailing list