[Mesa-dev] [RFC libdrm 0/2] Replace the build system with meson

Dylan Baker dylan at pnwbakers.com
Wed Mar 22 22:33:44 UTC 2017


Quoting Eric Anholt (2017-03-22 15:15:46)
> Rob Clark <robdclark at gmail.com> writes:
> 
> > On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 4:57 PM, Dylan Baker <dylan at pnwbakers.com> wrote:
> >> Here's a not so complete list: https://github.com/mesonbuild/meson/wiki/Users
> >>
> >> Notably gnome is moving to meson (and some parts already use it), weston and
> >> libinput have ports, libepoxy uses meson, and gstreamer is using meson. I
> >> can't say for sure it's going to be around forever, but its been in development
> >> since late 2012 and still lands several patches a day, they were responsive to
> >> me when I sent a patch (that I still need to respin), and they seem to be
> >> picking up momentum from downstreams.
> >
> >
> > btw, possibly newbie question, but from what I can tell so far in
> > meson docs, there are separate 'meson build && cd build && ninja'
> > steps.. one nice thing about autotools is 'git pull && make' (and it
> > somehow magically figures out whether to re-automake/autoconf).  Not
> > sure if there is a way to do something like that in meson.
> 
> Consider meson build to be ./autogen.sh.  After that point you can git
> pull && make.

Additionally, ninja has the same -C flag as make. So that can be 'meson build &&
ninja -C build' and 'git pull && ninja -C build'
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: signature
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-dev/attachments/20170322/ac02c921/attachment-0001.sig>


More information about the mesa-dev mailing list