[Mesa-dev] [PATCH] Haiku: convert to autotools

Emil Velikov emil.l.velikov at gmail.com
Mon Feb 12 15:18:11 UTC 2018


On 5 February 2018 at 22:14, kallisti5 <kallisti5 at unixzen.com> wrote:
> On 2018-02-05 15:39, Dylan Baker wrote:
>>
>> Quoting kallisti5 (2018-02-05 12:58:30)
>>>
>>> On 2017-10-24 11:47, Emil Velikov wrote:
>>> > Hi Jerome,
>>> >
>>> > On 23 October 2017 at 16:58, Jerome Duval <jerome.duval at gmail.com>
>>> > wrote:
>>> >> * configure.ac:
>>> >>   -pthread is not available on Haiku.
>>> >>   Haiku doesn't require --enable-dri
>>> >>   build hgl on Haiku
>>> >> * egl/Makefile.am: define backendfiles for Haiku
>>> >> * src/gallium/Makefile.am: build winsys/sw/hgl, state_trackers/hgl and
>>> >> targets/haiku-softpipe on Haiku.
>>> >> * src/gallium/targets/haiku-softpipe: add Makefile.am
>>> >> * src/gallium/state_trackers/hgl: add Makefile.am
>>> >> * winsys/sw/hgl: add Makefile.am
>>> >> * src/hgl/Makefile.am: add Makefile.am
>>> >> ---
>>> > Thanks for the patch. I think Eric has a point regarding splitting this
>>> > up.
>>> > Here is one way to handle it:
>>> >  - patch 1 - the driver, aka st/hgl + sw/hgl + targets/haiku
>>> >  - 2 - src/egl
>>> >  - 3 - src/hgl
>>> >  - 4 misc fixes (the SoftwareRenderer.cpp hunk?)
>>> >  - 5 toggle - configure.ac + src/Makefile.am
>>>
>>> Hm, it looks like Jerome never got back to work on these changes... let
>>> me try to
>>> pick up the ball and run with it.
>>>
>>> > Couple of small suggestions:
>>> >  - keep all the sources and headers in the sources lists in
>>> > Makefile.sources
>>> >  - how do you guys manage pthreads - please mention that in the commit
>>> > message.
>>> >
>>> > If I'm reading this correctly, you strip out -pthread and there's no
>>> > pthread-stubs on Haiku.
>>>
>>> Haiku (and BeOS for that matter) has pthread support built into its core
>>> libroot.so.
>>>
>>> No need for -lpthread, all applications can assume its presence. Things
>>> that link -lpthread actually fail due to a non-existant libpthread...
>>> *however* as i'm typing this i'm being told we recently implemented a
>>> dummy static libpthread.a to try and appease assumptions about -lpthread
>>> existence.... so i'll remove the pthread checks :-)
>>>

Seems like an extra L was added where it's not needed. Namely I
mentioned pthread (notice the lack of L)
For a while gcc/clang has worked on unifying all the pthread platform
specifics behind the -pthread toggle.

Some specifics include: presence/lack of a separate library, -D_REENTRANT,

>>>   -- Alex
>>
>>
>> Hi Alex,
>>
>> I have a branch for building haiku with meson, when I was trying to
>> compile
>> neither the scons build nor the autotools build seemed to compile on a
>> Haiku VM
>> instance (x86_64), that was a few months ago though, so maybe its fixed.
>>
>> Our plan is to remove autotools from mesa, probably this year. I'm
>> thinking if
>> things look pretty good through the 18.0 release cycle I'll probably
>> propose
>> marking autotools as deprecated for 18.1 and propose removal in 18.2.
>
>
> Ah. crap.  I just got autoconfig working :-).  Historically I have only used
> SCons for our builds.  I always preferred the SCons build since autotools
> always
> ends up looking like spaghetti.  Here is what our current build does:
>
> https://github.com/haikuports/haikuports/blob/master/sys-libs/mesa/mesa-17.1.4.recipe#L52
>
> It looks like Jerome hacked in a patch for autotools... but i've heard some
> reports
> of instability with the resulting artifacts.
>
AFAICT Jerome's work was fine, modulo the "let's do everything at
once" which tends to bite us all.
Can you please send that over, even if there's a meson support in the works.

Two is better than none ;-)

Thanks
Emil


More information about the mesa-dev mailing list