[Mesa-dev] [PATCH v2] nir: Handle variables dependent on the local work group size.

Jason Ekstrand jason at jlekstrand.net
Sun Nov 11 23:37:24 UTC 2018


On November 11, 2018 16:36:16 Karol Herbst <kherbst at redhat.com> wrote:

> On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 10:48 PM Jason Ekstrand <jason at jlekstrand.net> wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 3:35 PM Plamena Manolova 
>> <plamena.n.manolova at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Lowering shader variables which depend on the local work group
>>> size being available in nir_lower_system_values is only possible
>>> if the local work group size isn't variable, otherwise this should
>>> be handled by the native driver (if it supports
>>> ARB_compute_variable_group_size).
>>>
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Plamena Manolova <plamena.n.manolova at gmail.com>
>>> ---
>>> src/compiler/nir/nir_lower_system_values.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
>>>
>>>
>>> diff --git a/src/compiler/nir/nir_lower_system_values.c 
>>> b/src/compiler/nir/nir_lower_system_values.c
>>> index bde7eb1180..6fdf9f9c51 100644
>>> --- a/src/compiler/nir/nir_lower_system_values.c
>>> +++ b/src/compiler/nir/nir_lower_system_values.c
>>> @@ -77,6 +77,15 @@ convert_block(nir_block *block, nir_builder *b)
>>>    *    "The value of gl_GlobalInvocationID is equal to
>>>    *    gl_WorkGroupID * gl_WorkGroupSize + gl_LocalInvocationID"
>>>    */
>>> +
>>> +         /*
>>> +          * If the local work group size is variable we can't lower the global
>>> +          * invocation id here.
>>
>>
>> Why not?
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> +          */
>>> +         if (b->shader->info.cs.local_size_variable) {
>>
>>
>> I didn't realize we'd added a bit for this.  At one point in time, Karol 
>> had patches which had it keyed off of the size being zero.  Having a 
>> separate bit is probably fine, it just surpised me.
>
>
> yeah.. I guess I choose that, because I had nothing better. But I
> guess having the size being 0 is good enough as long as we sure it is
> 0 in relevant cases.

It's fine. I just thought we'd chosen a different convention bit there's 
nothing wrong with it. I was just surprised. That's all.

>
>>>
>>>
>>> +            break;
>>> +         }
>>> +
>>>   nir_ssa_def *group_size = build_local_group_size(b);
>>>   nir_ssa_def *group_id = nir_load_work_group_id(b);
>>>   nir_ssa_def *local_id = nir_load_local_invocation_id(b);
>>> @@ -115,6 +124,11 @@ convert_block(nir_block *block, nir_builder *b)
>>> }
>>>
>>>
>>> case SYSTEM_VALUE_LOCAL_GROUP_SIZE: {
>>> +         /* If the local work group size is variable we can't lower it here */
>>> +         if (b->shader->info.cs.local_size_variable) {
>>> +            break;
>>> +         }
>>> +
>>>   sysval = build_local_group_size(b);
>>>   break;
>>> }
>>> @@ -189,6 +203,14 @@ convert_block(nir_block *block, nir_builder *b)
>>>   break;
>>>
>>>
>>> case SYSTEM_VALUE_GLOBAL_GROUP_SIZE: {
>>> +         /*
>>> +          * If the local work group size is variable we can't lower the global
>>> +          * group size here.
>>> +          */
>>> +         if (b->shader->info.cs.local_size_variable) {
>>> +            break;
>>> +         }
>>
>>
>> Why can't we lower the global size?  It seems like we would want the below 
>> multiplication regardless of whether the local size is constant.
>
> well I am not sure about ARB_compute_variable_group_size, but at least
> in CL you know nothing about it at compile time as you specify
> everything when you enqueue the kernel. Could be that the number of
> work_groups is fixed with ARB_compute_variable_group_size though

Why can't you multiply two non-constant things together? Maybe the driver 
can do something now efficient but it's not clear to me that this isn't 
what we want.

>
>>>
>>>
>>> +
>>>   nir_ssa_def *group_size = build_local_group_size(b);
>>>   nir_ssa_def *num_work_groups = nir_load_num_work_groups(b);
>>>   sysval = nir_imul(b, group_size, num_work_groups);
>>> --
>>> 2.11.0
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> mesa-dev mailing list
>>> mesa-dev at lists.freedesktop.org
>>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev





More information about the mesa-dev mailing list