<div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 3:13 PM, Chia-I Wu <<a href="mailto:olvaffe@gmail.com">olvaffe@gmail.com</a>> wrote: <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"> Hi, With OpenGL ES coming to desktop, the way the current context/dispatch is stored, together with the way libGLES*.so is created, causes several issues[1]. The root of these issues is that the symbols defined in libGL.so and in libGLES*.so overlaps, and an application might link to both of them indirectly! In light of GLX_EXT_create_context_es2_profile, the simplest solution would be to stop distributing libGLES*.so. Applications will always link to libGL.so. Those that use GLX can then call glXGetProcAddress to get the addresses of OpenGL ES 2.0 functions. But those that use EGL will be in trouble. eglGetProcAddress is defined not to return the addresses of non-extension functions. </blockquote><div> I don't think it is a good solution to stop distributing libGLES*.so, because in embeded/mobile world, a lot of applications have dependency on libGLES*.so instead of libGL.so. </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"> If libGL.so and libGLES*.so both have to be distributed, then the question becomes how to handle symbols that overlaps gracefully. Accessing global variables such as _glapi_Context and _glapi_Dispatch will fail. Say libGL.so and libGLES*.so both has a copy of _glapi_Context. There is no guarantee that GET_CURRENT_CONTEXT will return the same context set by _glapi_set_context. Calling global functions will work as long as they are identical in both libGL.so and libGLES*.so. This means both libraries must agree on the order of slots in the dispatch table. And the problem with two copies of global _glapi_Dispatch also needs to be solved. One solution for these issues is to move _glapi_Context, _glapi_Dispatch, and _glapi_* functions to libglapi.so. libGL.so and libGLES*.so will both link to libglapi.so. All the libraries must be distributed together, as they must agree on the dispatch table used. This change should not break the ABI for existing DRI drivers. Another option is make _glapi_Context and _glapi_Dispatch local. libGL.so, libGLES*.so, and every DRI driver will get a renamed local copy of _glapi_Context and _glapi_Dispatch. To not break the ABI for old DRI drivers, libGL.so and libGLES*.so will still export _glapi_Dispatch and _glapi_Context. But same as the first solution, there must be a big dispatch table that libGL.so and libGLES*.so can agree on. </blockquote><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"> There should be other options, but these are all I have now. Any thought? [1] <a href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32285" target="_blank">https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32285</a> -- olv@LunarG.com _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list <a href="mailto:mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org">mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org</a> <a href="http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev" target="_blank">http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev</a> </blockquote></div>