<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW --- - x11-libs/libxcb media-libs/mesa segfault in __glXGetString" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57372#c9">Comment # 9</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW --- - x11-libs/libxcb media-libs/mesa segfault in __glXGetString" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57372">bug 57372</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:rich0@gentoo.org" title="Richard Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org>"> Richard Freeman</a> <pre>Ok, it turns out that I can eliminate this issue in xserver 1.13.0 if I revert two commits: ed6daa15a7dcf8dba930f67401f4c1c8ca2e6fac (mentioned above) bcbf95b1bafa6ffe724768b9309295e2fdb4b860 Author: Jon TURNEY <<a href="mailto:jon.turney@dronecode.org.uk">jon.turney@dronecode.org.uk</a>> Date: Thu Jul 12 00:36:10 2012 +0100 Revert bogus GlxPushProvider() in commit a1d41e3 a1d41e3 "Move extension initialisation prototypes into extinit.h" also includes a change to GlxExtensionInit to install the swrast GLX provider. Since b86aa74 "GLX: Insert swrast provider from GlxExtensionInit" already does this (correctly, by installing the swrast provider at the end of the chain, rather than at the beginning), and since this would seem to have the effect of making the swrast provider the most preferred provider, I'm guessing this wasn't intended. Signed-off-by: Jon TURNEY <<a href="mailto:jon.turney@dronecode.org.uk">jon.turney@dronecode.org.uk</a>> Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone <<a href="mailto:daniel@fooishbar.org">daniel@fooishbar.org</a>> Reviewed-by: Colin Harrison <<a href="mailto:colin.harrison@virgin.net">colin.harrison@virgin.net</a>> Parts of that second commit appear to have gotten reverted along the way already. I suspect that the GlxExtensionInit is the part of the second commit that is relevant. So, I haven't had any time to try to decipher what is going on - I suspect this will be more obvious to those who introduced the code in the first place. However, taking a look at this is my next step if nobody gets to it first. Appropriate action might be to either change xserver or mesa depending on which is actually wrong.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>