<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW --- - alloc_layout_array tx * ty assertion failure when making pbuffer current" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61012#c6">Comment # 6</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW --- - alloc_layout_array tx * ty assertion failure when making pbuffer current" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61012">bug 61012</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:brianp@vmware.com" title="Brian Paul <brianp@vmware.com>"> Brian Paul</a> <pre>(In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=61012#c5">comment #5</a>) > Created <a href="attachment.cgi?id=75068" name="attach_75068" title="another attempt to fix pbuffer initialization">attachment 75068</a> <a href="attachment.cgi?id=75068&action=edit" title="another attempt to fix pbuffer initialization">[details]</a> <a href='page.cgi?id=splinter.html&bug=61012&attachment=75068'>[review]</a> [review] > another attempt to fix pbuffer initialization > > Hmm is it legal to use XGetGeometry() with pbuffers? Not normally, but in the glx/xlib code we create a dummy pixmap for each pbuffer so that we have an XID that we can pass around. > I think something like this patch would be better. That would be fine too. It's what I first tried. > Not sure if guarding against zero-sized buffers in drivers is needed. Might > be but there are other instances where we hack up such windows to have > width/height of 1 for that reason so we don't have to do it in drivers. I hacked up a test for a 0x0 surface. Softpipe worked but the llvmpipe assertion failed. I guess I'd consider the llvmpipe change to be a defensive coding check. One less way for llvmpipe to fail is good thing.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>