<div dir="ltr">On 17 May 2013 21:44, Chia-I Wu <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:olvaffe@gmail.com" target="_blank">olvaffe@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 10:11 AM, Jordan Justen<br>
<<a href="mailto:jordan.l.justen@intel.com">jordan.l.justen@intel.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> Rather than pointing the surface_state directly at a single<br>
> sub-image of the texture for rendering, we now point the<br>
> surface_state at the top level of the texture, and configure<br>
> the surface_state as needed based on this.<br>
><br>
> We now also need to stop setting the FORCE_ZERO_RTAINDEX bit<br>
> in the clip date so render target array values other than zero<br>
> will be used.<br>
><br>
> Signed-off-by: Jordan Justen <<a href="mailto:jordan.l.justen@intel.com">jordan.l.justen@intel.com</a>><br>
> ---<br>
> src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_defines.h | 2 +<br>
> src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/gen7_clip_state.c | 3 +-<br>
> src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/gen7_wm_surface_state.c | 63 +++++++++++++++------<br>
> 3 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)<br>
><br>
> diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_defines.h b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_defines.h<br>
> index fedd78c..d61151f 100644<br>
> --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_defines.h<br>
> +++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_defines.h<br>
> @@ -539,6 +539,8 @@<br>
> #define GEN7_SURFACE_MULTISAMPLECOUNT_8 (3 << 3)<br>
> #define GEN7_SURFACE_MSFMT_MSS (0 << 6)<br>
> #define GEN7_SURFACE_MSFMT_DEPTH_STENCIL (1 << 6)<br>
> +#define GEN7_SURFACE_MIN_ARRAY_ELEMENT_SHIFT 18<br>
> +#define GEN7_SURFACE_RENDER_TARGET_VIEW_EXTENT_SHIFT 7<br>
><br>
> /* Surface state DW5 */<br>
> #define BRW_SURFACE_X_OFFSET_SHIFT 25<br>
> diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/gen7_clip_state.c b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/gen7_clip_state.c<br>
> index 29a5ed5..1256f32 100644<br>
> --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/gen7_clip_state.c<br>
> +++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/gen7_clip_state.c<br>
> @@ -107,8 +107,7 @@ upload_clip_state(struct brw_context *brw)<br>
> GEN6_CLIP_XY_TEST |<br>
> dw2);<br>
> OUT_BATCH(U_FIXED(0.125, 3) << GEN6_CLIP_MIN_POINT_WIDTH_SHIFT |<br>
> - U_FIXED(255.875, 3) << GEN6_CLIP_MAX_POINT_WIDTH_SHIFT |<br>
> - GEN6_CLIP_FORCE_ZERO_RTAINDEX);<br>
> + U_FIXED(255.875, 3) << GEN6_CLIP_MAX_POINT_WIDTH_SHIFT);<br>
> ADVANCE_BATCH();<br>
> }<br>
><br>
> diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/gen7_wm_surface_state.c b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/gen7_wm_surface_state.c<br>
> index 6c01545..5f15eff 100644<br>
> --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/gen7_wm_surface_state.c<br>
> +++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/gen7_wm_surface_state.c<br>
> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@<br>
> #include "main/mtypes.h"<br>
> #include "main/blend.h"<br>
> #include "main/samplerobj.h"<br>
> +#include "main/texformat.h"<br>
> #include "program/prog_parameter.h"<br>
><br>
> #include "intel_mipmap_tree.h"<br>
> @@ -529,12 +530,13 @@ gen7_update_renderbuffer_surface(struct brw_context *brw,<br>
> struct gl_context *ctx = &intel->ctx;<br>
> struct intel_renderbuffer *irb = intel_renderbuffer(rb);<br>
> struct intel_region *region = irb->mt->region;<br>
> - uint32_t tile_x, tile_y;<br>
> uint32_t format;<br>
> /* _NEW_BUFFERS */<br>
> gl_format rb_format = _mesa_get_render_format(ctx, intel_rb_format(irb));<br>
> -<br>
> - assert(!layered);<br>
> + uint32_t surftype;<br>
> + bool is_array = false;<br>
> + int depth = rb->Depth > 0 ? rb->Depth - 1 : 0;<br>
> + int min_array_element = 0;<br>
><br>
> uint32_t *surf = brw_state_batch(brw, AUB_TRACE_SURFACE_STATE,<br>
> 8 * 4, 32, &brw->wm.surf_offset[unit]);<br>
> @@ -550,7 +552,23 @@ gen7_update_renderbuffer_surface(struct brw_context *brw,<br>
> __FUNCTION__, _mesa_get_format_name(rb_format));<br>
> }<br>
><br>
> - surf[0] = BRW_SURFACE_2D << BRW_SURFACE_TYPE_SHIFT |<br>
> + if (rb->TexImage) {<br>
> + surftype = translate_tex_target(rb->TexImage->TexObject->Target);<br>
> + is_array = _mesa_tex_target_is_array(rb->TexImage->TexObject->Target);<br>
> + if (rb->TexImage->TexObject->Target == GL_TEXTURE_CUBE_MAP_ARRAY) {<br>
> + assert(rb->Depth > 0);<br>
> + surftype = BRW_SURFACE_2D;<br>
> + depth = (6 * (depth + 1)) - 1;<br>
> + } else if (rb->TexImage->TexObject->Target == GL_TEXTURE_CUBE_MAP) {<br>
> + surftype = BRW_SURFACE_2D;<br>
> + depth = 5;<br>
> + is_array = true;<br>
> + }<br>
> + } else {<br>
> + surftype = BRW_SURFACE_2D;<br>
> + }<br>
> +<br>
> + surf[0] = surftype << BRW_SURFACE_TYPE_SHIFT |<br>
> format << BRW_SURFACE_FORMAT_SHIFT |<br>
> (irb->mt->array_spacing_lod0 ? GEN7_SURFACE_ARYSPC_LOD0<br>
> : GEN7_SURFACE_ARYSPC_FULL) |<br>
> @@ -561,24 +579,33 @@ gen7_update_renderbuffer_surface(struct brw_context *brw,<br>
> if (irb->mt->align_w == 8)<br>
> surf[0] |= GEN7_SURFACE_HALIGN_8;<br>
><br>
> - /* reloc */<br>
> - surf[1] = intel_renderbuffer_tile_offsets(irb, &tile_x, &tile_y) +<br>
> - region->bo->offset; /* reloc */<br>
> + if (is_array) {<br>
> + surf[0] |= GEN7_SURFACE_IS_ARRAY;<br>
> + }<br>
> +<br>
> + if (!layered) {<br>
> + if (irb->mt->num_samples > 1) {<br>
> + min_array_element = irb->mt_layer / irb->mt->num_samples;<br>
> + } else {<br>
> + min_array_element = irb->mt_layer;<br>
> + }<br>
> + }<br>
> +<br>
> + surf[1] = region->bo->offset;<br>
><br>
> assert(brw->has_surface_tile_offset);<br>
> - /* Note that the low bits of these fields are missing, so<br>
> - * there's the possibility of getting in trouble.<br>
> - */<br>
> - assert(tile_x % 4 == 0);<br>
> - assert(tile_y % 2 == 0);<br>
> - surf[5] = SET_FIELD(tile_x / 4, BRW_SURFACE_X_OFFSET) |<br>
> - SET_FIELD(tile_y / 2, BRW_SURFACE_Y_OFFSET);<br>
><br>
> - surf[2] = SET_FIELD(rb->Width - 1, GEN7_SURFACE_WIDTH) |<br>
> - SET_FIELD(rb->Height - 1, GEN7_SURFACE_HEIGHT);<br>
> - surf[3] = region->pitch - 1;<br>
> + surf[5] = irb->mt_level;<br>
</div></div>The PRM says that the LOD field of all render targets and the depth<br>
buffer must be the same. Is this going to violate that?<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Based on some discussions with the hardware architects, and the fact that this patch series doesn't cause any piglit regressions, we believe that is not actually a hard requirement.<br>
</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class="im"><br>
> +<br>
> + surf[2] = SET_FIELD(irb->mt->logical_width0 - 1, GEN7_SURFACE_WIDTH) |<br>
> + SET_FIELD(irb->mt->logical_height0 - 1, GEN7_SURFACE_HEIGHT);<br>
> +<br>
> + surf[3] = (depth << BRW_SURFACE_DEPTH_SHIFT) |<br>
> + (region->pitch - 1);<br>
><br>
> - surf[4] = gen7_surface_msaa_bits(irb->mt->num_samples, irb->mt->msaa_layout);<br>
> + surf[4] = gen7_surface_msaa_bits(irb->mt->num_samples, irb->mt->msaa_layout) |<br>
> + min_array_element << GEN7_SURFACE_MIN_ARRAY_ELEMENT_SHIFT |<br>
> + depth << GEN7_SURFACE_RENDER_TARGET_VIEW_EXTENT_SHIFT;<br>
><br>
> if (irb->mt->msaa_layout == INTEL_MSAA_LAYOUT_CMS) {<br>
> gen7_set_surface_mcs_info(brw, surf, brw->wm.surf_offset[unit],<br>
> --<br>
> 1.7.10.4<br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> mesa-dev mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org">mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org</a><br>
> <a href="http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev" target="_blank">http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev</a><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</div>--<br>
olv@LunarG.com<br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">_______________________________________________<br>
mesa-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org">mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev" target="_blank">http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div></div>