<html> <head> <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"> </head> <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF"> Hi, I was looking at the latest commits and some comments here and there. Is it me or is docs/GL3.txt not up to date? For example, on Sept 24th ( <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"> <a href="http://web.archiveorange.com/archive/v/PjyyP3KOnlzH11QKVtyC">http://web.archiveorange.com/archive/v/PjyyP3KOnlzH11QKVtyC</a>), Marek was confirming <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"> GL_ARB_texture_multisample support for r600 and si (CIK missing). Thus, it should be listed as implemented for r600. And from my understanding, it was completed for the 9.2 release, so GL3.txt should have been updated before that. Intel pushed its latest patches to complete the 3.2 and 3.3 features in the last couple of days, but the GL3.txt was not updated at the same time. GLSL 1.50 and 3.30 should be listed as DONE for at least Intel. What I'm saying is I most of the time learn going through commits or Phoronix that a new feature is now considered done than from GL3.txt. GL3.txt should be updated at the same time as features are considered completed by a dev if it is truly complete. I know, I can find it by other means, but why not just make sure we are updating the doc at the right moment? My two cents as a tester... <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- Alexandre Demers</pre> </body> </html>