<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED NOTABUG - [bisected] GL programs fail with "loader.c:112: asserted_dlsym: Assertion `result' failed.""
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=74127#c5">Comment # 5</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED NOTABUG - [bisected] GL programs fail with "loader.c:112: asserted_dlsym: Assertion `result' failed.""
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=74127">bug 74127</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:oreaus@gmail.com" title="Scott Moreau <oreaus@gmail.com>"> <span class="fn">Scott Moreau</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=74127#c4">comment #4</a>)
<span class="quote">> (In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=74127#c3">comment #3</a>)
> > Should there be a configure check added to make it clear?
> Currently we check if libudev is available during compile/build time, and
> build the "offending" code only if it's present.
>
> Seems like you've built mesa on a system(environment) with libudev, and then
> ran it on another one that lacks the library.</span >
I have libudev standalone package that provides libudev.so.0. Replacing the lib
string in the code allows it to work. So it's checking for libudev but not
explicitly what version, or if the library that is needed exists.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>