<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW --- - egl-static/Makefile: linking fails with llvm >= 3.4" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70410#c23">Comment # 23</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW --- - egl-static/Makefile: linking fails with llvm >= 3.4" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70410">bug 70410</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:dawitbro@sbcglobal.net" title="Dave Witbrodt <dawitbro@sbcglobal.net>"> Dave Witbrodt</a> <pre>(In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=70410#c22">comment #22</a>) > > But I still cannot build without <a href="attachment.cgi?id=91725" name="attach_91725" title="Another patch, with newline hack">attachment 91725</a> <a href="attachment.cgi?id=91725&action=edit" title="Another patch, with newline hack">[details]</a> above. The LLVM > > fix referenced in this bug seems to have made it upstream (rev 202719), but > > that hasn't prevented my need for the patch. > > > What configure flags are you using for mesa? What error do you get when you > try to build mesa? It was PEBKAC. Sorry for the noise. Before I wrote <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=70410#c21">comment 21</a>, I had performed builds on Mar. 8, Mar. 10, and Mar. 11. I believed I was testing an unpatched Mesa from Mar. 11 (a few days old), but it must have been tampered with by myself. (I had been trying several different daily builds of LLVM 3.5 as well.) I have been busy for a busy for a few days, and have only now found time to return to this problem. Just now I was able to build a fresh, definitely untampered Mesa tree with no errors at all. I have no idea what stupidity I was doing a couple of days ago....</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>