<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW --- - -Wl,--no-undefined gives undefined references to libc symbols on OpenBSD" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76856#c6">Comment # 6</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW --- - -Wl,--no-undefined gives undefined references to libc symbols on OpenBSD" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76856">bug 76856</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:emil.l.velikov@gmail.com" title="Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@gmail.com>"> Emil Velikov</a> <pre>Seems like a lovely case. There is a very nice 10+ old topic wrt this behaviour and libtool [1]. To make things even better sometimes the linking rules differ between versions (FreeBSD 5 vs 4)[2]. Most annoying part IMHO is that the ld manual does not even hint about this *BSD "feature". With that said, we should avoid using -Wl,--no-undefined for OpenBSD but I would prefer to keep this on "as needed" basis. I.e. other *BSD flavours can opt in if needed. Jonathan Feel free to prep a patch and use your <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=76856#c3">comment 3</a> to prevent other zealots like me from ever touching that piece of mesa :) Thank you [1] <a href="http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-06/msg00483.html">http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-06/msg00483.html</a> [2] <a href="http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-06/msg00494.html">http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-06/msg00494.html</a></pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>