<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_VERIFIED bz_closed" title="VERIFIED FIXED - Mesa selects wrong DRI driver" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75212#c8">Comment # 8</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_VERIFIED bz_closed" title="VERIFIED FIXED - Mesa selects wrong DRI driver" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75212">bug 75212</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:kenneth@whitecape.org" title="Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>"> Kenneth Graunke</a> <pre>(In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=75212#c7">comment #7</a>) > The kernel I have to use is compiled without CONFIG_DEVTMPFS and without > CONFIG_FHANDLE. > > <a href="http://cgit.freedesktop.org/systemd/systemd/tree/README">http://cgit.freedesktop.org/systemd/systemd/tree/README</a> states that at least > these options are required, the later one explicitly for libudev, so using > libudev seems not to be an option for me :( Why not file a bug with your distribution mentioning that Mesa now requires libudev (but not udev), and asking them to enable the necessary options? CONFIG_FHANDLE appears to add no additional runtime cost, and adds a single syscall that's maybe 100 lines of code. Basically nothing. We'd really like to avoid having to maintain multiple paths.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>