<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW --- - wrong color in flightgear for the c172p if "Atmospheric light scattering" is used"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81500#c16">Comment # 16</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW --- - wrong color in flightgear for the c172p if "Atmospheric light scattering" is used"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81500">bug 81500</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:mister.freeman@laposte.net" title="Barto <mister.freeman@laposte.net>"> <span class="fn">Barto</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=81500#c15">comment #15</a>)
<span class="quote">> Unlikely. Stable releases tend to contain cherry-picks of patches from
> master, not patches attached to random bugs. (Exceptions can of course be
> made.)</span >
for me with my ati radeon HD4650 ( who uses r600 driver ) it's not a random
bug, the bug is always reproducible with flightgear 3.0.0,
the use case is simple : a C172P airplane and the use of the option
"Atmospheric light scattering", with my graphic card ati HD4650 ( and maybe
other models ) something goes wrong in the mesa code,
but I am not an expert in opengl programming,
perhaps we must contact the author of the faulty commit ( Ian Romanick ) :
<a href="http://cgit.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/commit/?id=d030a3404ca0fedf365cb0fd41eaad7abc8ff132">http://cgit.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/commit/?id=d030a3404ca0fedf365cb0fd41eaad7abc8ff132</a>
he may know the solution with the apitrace, a missing update of a variable
related to the R600 driver for example ?
<span class="quote">>
> Perhaps it got reverted/somehow fixed? If you can figure out what fixes this
> in master, it can be cherry-picked back to the 10.2 branch for the next
> stable release. Or if the fixes are deemed too invasive, perhaps the revert
> will indeed be appropriate.</span >
I think also that someone who works in 10.2 branch has reverted this commit
because he found some bugs or strange results in test softwares like piglit ?</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>