<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW --- - wrong color in flightgear for the c172p if "Atmospheric light scattering" is used"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81500#c15">Comment # 15</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW --- - wrong color in flightgear for the c172p if "Atmospheric light scattering" is used"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81500">bug 81500</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:imirkin@alum.mit.edu" title="Ilia Mirkin <imirkin@alum.mit.edu>"> <span class="fn">Ilia Mirkin</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=81500#c14">comment #14</a>)
<span class="quote">> Do you know if a mesa 10.2.5 will contain my patch in order to solve this
> bug ?</span >
Unlikely. Stable releases tend to contain cherry-picks of patches from master,
not patches attached to random bugs. (Exceptions can of course be made.)
<span class="quote">> and I notice that mesa 10.3.x doesn't have the bug ( because the file
> /src/glsl/link_varyings.cpp doesn't have the changes made by the faulty
> commit d030a3404ca0fedf365cb0fd41eaad7abc8ff132 )</span >
Perhaps it got reverted/somehow fixed? If you can figure out what fixes this in
master, it can be cherry-picked back to the 10.2 branch for the next stable
release. Or if the fixes are deemed too invasive, perhaps the revert will
indeed be appropriate.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>