<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW --- - MESA checks on configure for llvm 3.4.2 and fails to build with 3.4.2 being installed" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81785#c4">Comment # 4</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW --- - MESA checks on configure for llvm 3.4.2 and fails to build with 3.4.2 being installed" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81785">bug 81785</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:tobias.klausmann@mni.thm.de" title="Tobias Klausmann <tobias.klausmann@mni.thm.de>"> Tobias Klausmann</a> <pre>(In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=81785#c3">comment #3</a>) > (In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=81785#c1">comment #1</a>) > > I had the exact same problem, but came to the conclusion that LLVM needs to > > be patched to resolve this. This was done for Opensuse and works fine! > > > > <a href="https://build.opensuse.org/package/view_file/home:tobijk:X11:XOrg/llvm/cmake">https://build.opensuse.org/package/view_file/home:tobijk:X11:XOrg/llvm/cmake</a>- > > patchversion.patch?expand=1 > > > > go bother the LLVM package maintainer :) > > It seems like building llvm with cmake is not the most common practise - > iirc there was an RTTI issue a while back and now this thus. Might be better > if you forward the patch to the llvm if you haven't already. This way more > people can benefit from your work(patch) :) > There was a intention in switching to cmake a while back, i think it was easier to build the radeonsi (?) backend with it. I'll ask the patchcreator to upstream it.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>