<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW --- - fix build with gcc link time optimizer" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=83669#c3">Comment # 3</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW --- - fix build with gcc link time optimizer" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=83669">bug 83669</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:emil.l.velikov@gmail.com" title="Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@gmail.com>"> Emil Velikov</a> <pre>(In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=83669#c2">comment #2</a>) > Well, initially, debug and lto could be exclusive via configure options, > e.g. --enable-debug or --enable-lto. > Actually it's a bit more convoluted than that. Most distro prep -dbg packages, which contain the debug symbols (i.e. build mesa and others with -g*). Last time I've checked all of them did not bother having any checks for LTO & -g* which will cause the issue :'( > I checked a bit further and with my current setup (r600 gallium), it is only > the error above and another one coming from some gcc build-in functions, so > it shouldn't be a big deal to enable it. Unfortunately, I'm just an ordinary > user with minimal programming skills :-( > Feel free to have it locally, but for now I would prefer if mesa opts-out. As new and better gcc comes along my I will likely reconsider my statement :P</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>