<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - CPU cacheline size of 0 can be returned by CPUID leaf 0x80000006 in some virtual machines"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87913#c3">Comment # 3</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - CPU cacheline size of 0 can be returned by CPUID leaf 0x80000006 in some virtual machines"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87913">bug 87913</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:sroland@vmware.com" title="Roland Scheidegger <sroland@vmware.com>"> <span class="fn">Roland Scheidegger</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>I'm wondering if we actually should use this detection method if the other one
(which queries clflush size in fact) is also available. I guess though there's
some (amd) cpus where the other method isn't available. Not sure what's the
better method to use in any case if both are available (might even provide the
same number on all existing cpus).
Regardless, the patch looks good.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>