<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_ASSIGNED "
title="ASSIGNED - nir.c:140: error: ‘nir_src’ has no member named ‘ssa’"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88467#c11">Comment # 11</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_ASSIGNED "
title="ASSIGNED - nir.c:140: error: ‘nir_src’ has no member named ‘ssa’"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88467">bug 88467</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:jason@jlekstrand.net" title="Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>"> <span class="fn">Jason Ekstrand</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Jason Ekstrand from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=88467#c10">comment #10</a>)
<span class="quote">> (In reply to Dave Airlie from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=88467#c6">comment #6</a>)
> > This is actually more annoying
> >
> > with gcc 4.4
> >
> > gcc -std=gnu99 supports anonymous structs, but doesn't support designated
> > initialisers for anonymous structs.
> >
> > I'm not really sure what we can do now, I've built with -std=gnu99 and now
> > get less warnings but all the designated initalisers are fail.
>
> I've been meaning to get rid of those. They don't work properly on msvc
> either. I'll kick out a patch later today and note it on the bug.</span >
I just dropped the patches on the list. If a branch is better, it can be found
here:
<a href="http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~jekstrand/mesa/log/?h=review/src-constructors">http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~jekstrand/mesa/log/?h=review/src-constructors</a></pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>