<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_ASSIGNED " title="ASSIGNED - nir.c:140: error: ‘nir_src’ has no member named ‘ssa’" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88467#c18">Comment # 18</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_ASSIGNED " title="ASSIGNED - nir.c:140: error: ‘nir_src’ has no member named ‘ssa’" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88467">bug 88467</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:emil.l.velikov@gmail.com" title="Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@gmail.com>"> Emil Velikov</a> <pre>(In reply to Jason Ekstrand from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=88467#c13">comment #13</a>) > (In reply to Emil Velikov from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=88467#c12">comment #12</a>) > > Jason, > > > > MSVC 2013 supports designated initialisers yet the VMWare guys cannot > > migrate to it yet iirc. > > > It does... sort-of. Unfortunately, the fact that they don't work with > unions is a well-documented bug in MSVC 2013. > /me was thinking that he tried such a scenario, but most likely he was confused. (In reply to Connor Abbott from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=88467#c14">comment #14</a>) > I definitely don't want to remove the anonymous union from nir_src. We use > it all over the place, Indeed. There is also nir_dest and nir_const_value. So that suggestion goes down in flames. > and it really helps with readability and > writeability. Without it, we would have to say "src[n].src.src.ssa" or > "src[n].src.src.reg" for ALU sources, which just seems silly. There are a handful of other silly things around :) Thanks for the help/input guys.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>