<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_ASSIGNED " title="ASSIGNED - nir.c:140: error: ‘nir_src’ has no member named ‘ssa’" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88467#c16">Comment # 16</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_ASSIGNED " title="ASSIGNED - nir.c:140: error: ‘nir_src’ has no member named ‘ssa’" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88467">bug 88467</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:cwabbott0@gmail.com" title="Connor Abbott <cwabbott0@gmail.com>"> Connor Abbott</a> <pre>(In reply to Jason Ekstrand from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=88467#c15">comment #15</a>) > (In reply to Connor Abbott from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=88467#c14">comment #14</a>) > > I definitely don't want to remove the anonymous union from nir_src. We use > > it all over the place, and it really helps with readability and > > writeability. Without it, we would have to say "src[n].src.src.ssa" or > > "src[n].src.src.reg" for ALU sources, which just seems silly. > > The anonymous union isn't the problem. That's fine with --std=gnu99. The > problem is that they don't work with designated initializers. Now that > those are gone, NIR builds just fine with --std=gnu99. We're just waiting > for patch review to finish on the configure.ac patch and we'll be building > on GCC 4.4 again. Sure, I was just replying to Emil's suggestion.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>