<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - codegen/nv50_ir.h:585:9: error: no member named 'tr1' in namespace 'std'" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88766#c5">Comment # 5</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - codegen/nv50_ir.h:585:9: error: no member named 'tr1' in namespace 'std'" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88766">bug 88766</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:currojerez@riseup.net" title="Francisco Jerez <currojerez@riseup.net>"> Francisco Jerez</a> <pre>(In reply to Ilia Mirkin from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=88766#c4">comment #4</a>) > (In reply to Vinson Lee from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=88766#c3">comment #3</a>) > > Created <a href="attachment.cgi?id=112757" name="attach_112757" title="Remove tr1 namespace.">attachment 112757</a> <a href="attachment.cgi?id=112757&action=edit" title="Remove tr1 namespace.">[details]</a> <a href='page.cgi?id=splinter.html&bug=88766&attachment=112757'>[review]</a> [review] [review] > > Remove tr1 namespace. > Hi Ilia, > That would require C++11 support, which I feel a lot worse about requiring > than having nouveau not compile with clang. I'm surprised that clang chose > not to ship tr1 headers... oh well. > Actually I suspect your platform support would increase by relying on the C++11 standard library rather than an on a non-standard extension. Most likely this bug is not caused by the Clang compiler itself, but by the standard library implementation. Apparently FreeBSD ships with LLVM's libc++ as default implementation these days, which implements the C++11 standard library and doesn't attempt to support the TR1 namespace, which is a C++03-specific extension. > If someone maps out the various version support for all this, perhaps we can > make a decision. Or some other approach is the standard way to deal with > this? I'd suggest we apply Vinson's patch and then build the codegen back-end with -std=c++0x (available on GCC 4.3 and later), otherwise GNU's libstdc++ will emit an error if you include any of the C++11 headers while building in C++98/03 mode. -std=c++11 would work too but it's only supported since GCC 4.7. Any reasonably recent Clang version (at least 2.9) should support both switches.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>