<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - [osmesa] Crash on postprocessing if z buffer is NULL"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88962#c6">Comment # 6</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - [osmesa] Crash on postprocessing if z buffer is NULL"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88962">bug 88962</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:brianp@vmware.com" title="Brian Paul <brianp@vmware.com>"> <span class="fn">Brian Paul</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Park, Jeongmin from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=88962#c5">comment #5</a>)
<span class="quote">> Sorry about the first patch. I didn't see that.
>
> In dri_sw.c, it checks for z/s buffer:
> > if (ctx->pp && drawable->textures[ST_ATTACHMENT_DEPTH_STENCIL])
> > pp_run(ctx->pp, ptex, ptex, drawable->textures[ST_ATTACHMENT_DEPTH_STENCIL]);
> and in dri_drawable.c:
> > if (ctx->pp && src && zsbuf)
> > pp_run(ctx->pp, src, src, zsbuf);
>
> Should I remove these checks and add the checks in pp_mlaa.cc instead?</span >
Yes, I think that would be better.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>