<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Drivers, Gallium/legacy swrast glDrawPixels differences"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89624#c3">Comment # 3</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Drivers, Gallium/legacy swrast glDrawPixels differences"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89624">bug 89624</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:daniel.sebald@ieee.org" title="Dan Sebald <daniel.sebald@ieee.org>"> <span class="fn">Dan Sebald</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>Taking a second look at the Gallium driver PNG, I'm wondering if my original
assessment is correct, i.e., that the scaled image in the frame buffer is
extending past the bottom in the y-dimension. The edges seem to align, while
perhaps it is just that the axis box drawn around the image has a missing pixel
in the lower right corner for some scalings. If that is the case, perhaps it
is only the legacy driver that is inconsistent, with regard to glDrawPixels.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>