<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Drivers/DRI/swrast" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89586#c34">Comment # 34</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Drivers/DRI/swrast" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89586">bug 89586</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:daniel.sebald@ieee.org" title="Dan Sebald <daniel.sebald@ieee.org>"> Dan Sebald</a> <pre>Created <a href="attachment.cgi?id=114599" name="attach_114599" title="swrast Gallium with patch Piglit test images">attachment 114599</a> <a href="attachment.cgi?id=114599&action=edit" title="swrast Gallium with patch Piglit test images">[details]</a> swrast Gallium with patch Piglit test images SWRAST_DRI.SO GALLIUM PATCH By making that simple change in src/mesa/state_tracker/st_cb_drawpixels.c that allows the driver to proceed if the input image size is greater than GL_MAX_TEXTURE_SIZE, I've found that the Gallium driver will complete the monotonic image grandients and generally looks good except for the last pixel (line) missing for both positive X and Y tests. Again, this is just an initial investigation, so we aren't sure yet whether there is a shortcoming in the test algorithm, or whether the Gallium driver might not be meeting the OpenGL standard for glDrawPixels exactly, e.g., a boundary condition isn't being satisfy such as pixel centers on the left or bottom box boundary are considered in the box.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>