<div dir="ltr"><div><div>If these two go: GL_ARB_shader_subroutine GL_ARB_tessellation_shader </div>Should the Mesa release be called Mesa 11? Since new major of OGL is reached. </div>Dragomir </div><div class="gmail_extra"> <div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 8:11 PM, Jason Ekstrand <<a href="mailto:jason@jlekstrand.net" target="_blank">jason@jlekstrand.net</a>> wrote: <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">There was some discussion on IRC today about what the official date is. A bunch of Intel people have been working under the assumption that it's the end of next week, not this week. Was there some non-public discussion and a decision to slip? We would like to get two things in before the branch point: 1) The MUL series Matt just sent 2) Use NIR by default for GEN8+ VS. If we don't want to slip too far we can probably get both in by Monday. --Jason <div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"> On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 8:26 AM, Emil Velikov <<a href="mailto:emil.l.velikov@gmail.com">emil.l.velikov@gmail.com</a>> wrote: > Hello all, > > On 21 April 2015 at 13:40, Emil Velikov <<a href="mailto:emil.l.velikov@gmail.com">emil.l.velikov@gmail.com</a>> wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Here is the preliminary release schedule for Mesa 10.6. Personally I >> would love if we can go up to Mesa 11.0 (Spinal Tap anyone ?) although >> it might happen with the September release. >> >> May 15th 2015 - Feature freeze/Release candidate 1 >> May 22st 2015 - Release candidate 2 >> May 29th 2015 - Release candidate 3 >> June 5th 2015 - Release candidate 4/Mesa 10.6.0 >> >> This means that we have roughly four weeks to get new features in, and >> another four weeks to get all the serious bugs sorted out. >> >> Does this sound reasonable with the different teams ? If anyone has >> something special in mind please speak up. >> > This is a gentle reminder that we have one week until the 10.6 branch > point. As far as I can see we have a few extensions which may or may > not make it in time. I would be fine if we need an extra week to > finish up any of the following extensions considering their importance > and/or how long people have been working on them. If you feel the same > way please speak up, otherwise the schedule will stay as outlined > previously. > > GL_ARB_shader_subroutine > GL_ARB_tessellation_shader > GL_ARB_shader_image_load_store > GL_ARB_direct_state_access > > Thanks > Emil > _______________________________________________ > mesa-dev mailing list > <a href="mailto:mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org">mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org</a> > <a href="http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev" target="_blank">http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev</a> _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list <a href="mailto:mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org">mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org</a> <a href="http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev" target="_blank">http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev</a> </div></div></blockquote></div> </div>