<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - [TRACKER] Mesa regression tracker"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79706#c2">Comment # 2</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - [TRACKER] Mesa regression tracker"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79706">bug 79706</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:emil.l.velikov@gmail.com" title="Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@gmail.com>"> <span class="fn">Emil Velikov</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>Actually I was contemplating on bringing back the "per release" regression
tracker idea which brought us here in the first place.
It will give us a clearer picture of the regressions when planning/doing the
releasing. How would people feel on the topic ?
One small catch is that the regressions reported by the Intel QA might cause
spam as they're lacking the "bisected" "regression" keywords and the Product
Version is "unspecified". Matt any ideas if we can have these with the original
report - who can we speak to about this ?</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>