<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - [regression, bisected] Piglit spec/ext_packed_float/ getteximage-invalid-format-for-packed-type fails" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91425#c4">Comment # 4</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - [regression, bisected] Piglit spec/ext_packed_float/ getteximage-invalid-format-for-packed-type fails" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91425">bug 91425</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:brianp@vmware.com" title="Brian Paul <brianp@vmware.com>"> Brian Paul</a> <pre>OK, the problem is my local copy of getteximage-invalid-format-for-packed-type.c has the patch "ext_packed_float: fix getteximage-invalid-format-for-packed-type test" which I posted for review (and was R-b'd by Jose) but not yet pushed to master. I believe the piglit test was defective as-is, per my check-in comment: The GL spec doesn't explicitly say that glGetTexImage should generate GL_INVALID_OPERATION when attempting to retrieve a non-existant texture image, but that's what NVIDIA's driver does. The purpose of this test is to check the format/type parameters, so let's define a packed float texture to avoid the undefined texture situation. Test now passes with NVIDIA. I'll push that patch.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>