<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_REOPENED " title="REOPENED - linker.cpp:3187:46: error: ‘strtok_r’ was not declared in this scope" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92183#c10">Comment # 10</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_REOPENED " title="REOPENED - linker.cpp:3187:46: error: ‘strtok_r’ was not declared in this scope" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92183">bug 92183</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:jfonseca@vmware.com" title="Jose Fonseca <jfonseca@vmware.com>"> Jose Fonseca</a> <pre>(In reply to Brian Paul from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=92183#c7">comment #7</a>) > I routinely use MinGW 4.6.3: > > $ i686-w64-mingw32-g++ --version > i686-w64-mingw32-g++ (GCC) 4.6.3 If this version is still widely used, then it would be nice to keep it building. That said, I'm afraid I can't help. I used 4.6 for a long time (as for a period of time, certain mingw versions introduced a dependency of winpthreads-1.dll) but newer versions (e.g., Ubtuntu 15.04's) no longer depend on it, so I stopped using it. (In reply to Emil Velikov from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=92183#c8">comment #8</a>) > Iirc the mingw + autoconf build was dropped. So we might want to 'sync' with > the autoconf build. The latter currently requires gcc 4.2, whist 4.6 is > recommended. > > Although as Brian said, I'm not sure if we have that explicitly documented. It's not just the GCC version that matter for mingw. More than that, it's the MinGW runtime headers themselves.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>