<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Black screen in War Thunder" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92278#c8">Comment # 8</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Black screen in War Thunder" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92278">bug 92278</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:lemody@gmail.com" title="Tapani Pälli <lemody@gmail.com>"> Tapani Pälli</a> <pre>(In reply to Ian Romanick from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=92278#c7">comment #7</a>) > (In reply to Tapani Pälli from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=92278#c4">comment #4</a>) > > Created <a href="attachment.cgi?id=119200" name="attach_119200" title="hack that fixes issue">attachment 119200</a> <a href="attachment.cgi?id=119200&action=edit" title="hack that fixes issue">[details]</a> <a href='page.cgi?id=splinter.html&bug=92278&attachment=119200'>[review]</a> [review] [review] > > hack that fixes issue > > > > This is slightly cleaner but still just a hack, it looks like we would need > > full GL_EXT_direct_state_access and also GL_EXT_depth_bounds_test extension. > > Why do you think GL_EXT_depth_bounds_test is necessary? There's calls to glEnable and glDisable with DEPTH_BOUNDS_TEST_EXT, not sure if it is really needed as I haven't spotted any graphical glitches during those scenes. > Either way... we're absolutely not going to do EXT_dsa. We have ARB_dsa in > core profile, and that's what applications should use. Spending a bunch of > time to implement the backward-looking extension, at the expense of other > features, when we already support the forward-looking functionality doesn't > help anyone in the long run. Yep I agree.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>