<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Configure should not have hardcoded list of {dri,gallium} drivers" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93278#c3">Comment # 3</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Configure should not have hardcoded list of {dri,gallium} drivers" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93278">bug 93278</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:mattst88@gmail.com" title="Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>"> Matt Turner</a> <pre>(In reply to Emil Velikov from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=93278#c2">comment #2</a>) > Fwiw I would like to get things to the point of either: > - enable the drivers that have their dependencies resolved > - or, enable all drivers by default. > > I'm split between the two, but I'm strongly against "dest. system is ARM, > let's disable intel, radeon, nouveau, etc." drivers approach. I sent patches once (and am still partial to) requiring users to specify which drivers they want. Developers and distributions know which driver(s) they want to build. The only use-case I heard that this wouldn't handle is the "I just want to build test everything and I don't want to have to look up what everything means" which honestly doesn't strike me as a serious issue, but also one that should be easily solvable.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>