<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED NOTABUG - Performance improvement : Please consider hardware ɢᴘᴜ rendering in llvmpipe"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93686#c13">Comment # 13</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED NOTABUG - Performance improvement : Please consider hardware ɢᴘᴜ rendering in llvmpipe"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93686">bug 93686</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:alexdeucher@gmail.com" title="Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com>"> <span class="fn">Alex Deucher</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to ytrezq from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=93686#c10">comment #10</a>)
<span class="quote">> (In reply to Jan Vesely from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=93686#c9">comment #9</a>)
> > If GPU<->CPU synchronization is the only problem then the idea should work
> > for iGPUs with coherent access to main memory (HSA complaint?). Then again
> > those GPUs probably won't need CPU help any time soon.
>
> Intel or ᴀᴍᴅ ᴀᴘᴜs can’t (theoretically) do memory sharing between ᴄᴘᴜ ᴀɴᴅ
> ɢᴘᴜ.
> Intel or ᴀᴍᴅ ᴀᴘᴜs use ᴘᴄɪe even if they are on the same die of the ᴄᴘᴜ. The
> ʙɪᴏꜱ or the ᴜᴇꜰɪ firmware allocate a fixed portion of ʀᴀᴍ that appear as
> part of “hardware reserved memory” to the ᴏꜱ.
> There’s no Unified memory, data has to use the internal ᴘᴄɪe bus. It’s the
> same as if the card was an external one with it’s own memory (though it can
> directly address ᴄᴘᴜ ram modules).
> </span >
I can't speak for intel, but on AMD APUs, while the GPU appears as a device on
the PCIE bus, it actually has a much faster internal connection to the memory
controller.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>