[Nice] Gracefull fallback, renegotiations?

[Olivier Crête]

On Thu, 2008-07-03 at 19:43 +0300, mikhail.zabaluev at nokia.com wrote:
> >> Don't you have to bind to every local interface, in order to 
> >send candidate checks properly?
> >> It might matter with VPN and IP migration.
> >
> >Won't you bind the same socket to every interface?
> 
> I dunno. Would you like to receive incoming checks on all interfaces?
> At minimum two sockets are needed: one bound to a particular address to send a check, and one listening on INADDR_ANY, if that's even possible to have at the same time.

Nice uses the same socket and send the messages with sendto() if I read
the code correctly.

-- 
Olivier Crête
olivier.crete at collabora.co.uk
Collabora Ltd
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/nice/attachments/20080703/43aa3352/attachment.pgp