[Nice] Gracefull fallback, renegotiations?

[Olivier Crête]

On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 10:17 +0300, Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote:
> On Friday 04 July 2008 17:23:18 ext Olivier Crête, you wrote:
> > I guess even if we have a TCP socket, nice could guess which local
> > socket to pick based on the forced candidate...
> 
> Depends how you characterize a forced candidate. There may obviously be 
> multiple TCP sockets on the same local port/IP pair, one for each connection 
> attempt (and more than that if doing retries), plus the listening socket. So 
> if forced candidate means the sockaddr, it wouldn't work.

I'm thinking of caracterising it in terms of remote af/protocol/ip/port
(which should uniquely identify it?)

-- 
Olivier Crête
olivier.crete at collabora.co.uk
Collabora Ltd
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/nice/attachments/20080707/5d465f22/attachment.pgp