<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW --- - [Regression] Since kernel v3.5 several cards fail to resume, introduced by: 'convert to exec engine, and improve channel sync'" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50121#c49">Comment # 49</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW --- - [Regression] Since kernel v3.5 several cards fail to resume, introduced by: 'convert to exec engine, and improve channel sync'" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50121">bug 50121</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:mr.dash.four@googlemail.com" title="Mr-4 <mr.dash.four@googlemail.com>"> Mr-4</a> <pre>(In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=50121#c38">comment #38</a>) > This patch is not directly applicable to kernels < 3.7, although porting it > is trivial. "Porting" of that patch against 3.6 is far from "trivial" - exercise in futility more like! There is no "nv50_fence.c" to start off with, "nouveau_drm" struct isn't there either, let alone that "nv10_fence_priv" doesn't seem to have "base.resume" defined at all. I think I am going to stick with 3.3 until 3.7 comes out and then decide what to do next...</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>