<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW --- - DRM NOUVEAU: probe of 0001:01:00.0 failed with error -12"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58984#c16">Comment # 16</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW --- - DRM NOUVEAU: probe of 0001:01:00.0 failed with error -12"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58984">bug 58984</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:koriakin@0x04.net" title="Marcin Kościelnicki <koriakin@0x04.net>"> <span class="fn">Marcin Kościelnicki</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=58984#c15">comment #15</a>)
<span class="quote">> Which makes sense / is the right route? A private PAGE_SHIFT|MASK|SIZE for
> GPUs or using the system page size consistently? Are all NV GPUs that
> support paging using 4K pages? (I say "support paging" because I had an NV17
> GPU that worked fine on SPARC, OpenGL games worked and all).
> </span >
All nvidia GPUs all the way back to NV01 support 4kB pages (with NV50-gen ones
also supporting 16kB + 64kB and NVC0-gen also supporting 128kB, but these sizes
are usually only used for VRAM and not system RAM).</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>