<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW --- - [nouveau, nv50] linux 3.9.7-3.10.3: Xorg won't be available" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67382#c31">Comment # 31</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW --- - [nouveau, nv50] linux 3.9.7-3.10.3: Xorg won't be available" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67382">bug 67382</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:emil.l.velikov@gmail.com" title="Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@gmail.com>"> Emil Velikov</a> <pre>(In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=67382#c30">comment #30</a>) > As the days went by. I'm wondering what I should do. Or what's the case with > this report. > Is it kind of a problem, that I need to take care myself? E.g. it cannot be > patched/removed/altered, because this stabilisation is needed and would harm > other cards? > Point is I've asked a few people and no-one seems to have such issue like you. So I'm suspecting that it's related to the original NV50. With that said the only person I can think of having such a card to test is the nouveau/kernel maintainer. Which is quite busy, but hopefully will have a moment to test. Side effect of using the new "fix" is causing a regression on almost all other cards, and/or the need to increase the delay to a silly value (as it was before).</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>