<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" />
</head>
<body><span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:imirkin@alum.mit.edu" title="Ilia Mirkin <imirkin@alum.mit.edu>"> <span class="fn">Ilia Mirkin</span></a>
</span> changed
<a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW --- - [NV17] PowerMac3,6 Driver can't detect video output and xserver doesn't start"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21273">bug 21273</a>
<br>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
<tr>
<th>What</th>
<th>Removed</th>
<th>Added</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:right;">Summary</td>
<td>Driver can't detect video output and xserver doesn't start
</td>
<td>[NV17] PowerMac3,6 Driver can't detect video output and xserver doesn't start
</td>
</tr></table>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW --- - [NV17] PowerMac3,6 Driver can't detect video output and xserver doesn't start"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21273#c76">Comment # 76</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW --- - [NV17] PowerMac3,6 Driver can't detect video output and xserver doesn't start"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21273">bug 21273</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:imirkin@alum.mit.edu" title="Ilia Mirkin <imirkin@alum.mit.edu>"> <span class="fn">Ilia Mirkin</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>I noticed that in your patch you have OUTPUT_TMDS twice instead of
OUTPUT_ANALOG the second time. Was that on purpose? Esp since it sounds like
you're using the analog "part" of the DVI cable, that seems like it could be
relevant. Does this hardware still exist in a working state to test potential
patches?
Also, am I correct in understanding that the old "nv" driver worked fine?</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>