<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_REOPENED "
title="REOPENED --- - GF108 (NVC1) GPU lockup"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69488#c12">Comment # 12</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_REOPENED "
title="REOPENED --- - GF108 (NVC1) GPU lockup"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69488">bug 69488</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:vekinn@gmail.com" title="Kevin N. <vekinn@gmail.com>"> <span class="fn">Kevin N.</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=69488#c11">comment #11</a>)
<span class="quote">> The IORESOURCE_BUSY patch is already on its way to Linus. However, all it
> does is suppressing this warning.
>
> Could you describe what exactly the bug is you were seeing? You said it
> falls back to "software frame buffer". The log doesn't say anything like
> this, what do you mean by that?
> Also, how did you detect a GPU lock-up?
>
> If the warning is all you see but everything was working just fine, this bug
> can be closed. As the warning says "Your kernel is fine." this isn't serious
> at all and shouldn't cause any issues. If you saw any other weird behavior,
> please describe what exactly happened (apart from the oops message in the
> log).</span >
My nvidia card doesn't work right with optimus and nouveau on 3.12-rc2.
Starting X does sometimes work but the display stops responding soon after or
when I run xrandr. Having my displayport plugged in seems to prevent that.
GPU lockup was probably poor choice in words, display stops responding is more
accurate. I end up having to power the machine off.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>