<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW --- - [NV98] [BISECTED] Hardware freeze after resume from suspend" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67878#c34">Comment # 34</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW --- - [NV98] [BISECTED] Hardware freeze after resume from suspend" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67878">bug 67878</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:pontus.fuchs@gmail.com" title="Pontus Fuchs <pontus.fuchs@gmail.com>"> Pontus Fuchs</a> <pre>(In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=67878#c32">comment #32</a>) > One idea I just randomly had was that there might be a difference in the > teardown process. For example, in the removed code, nv50_display_fini did > stuff. In the current code, it's basically empty (well, some small bits in > nouveau_display_fini). > > It looks like the old code > > (a) blanked each crtc > (b) sent out a EVO_UPDATE command > (c) waited for each crtc to hit a vblank > (d) did something with the cursor (cleared it?) > (e) waited for some sort of DPMS thing > > It could well be that this now happens elsewhere, but I just wanted to put > that thought down on "paper". I tried this idea by doing the following: 1) Checked out 4f6029da58ba9204c98e33f4f3737fe085c87a6f^1 (= f9887d091149406de5c8b388f7e0bb6932dd621b) 2) Deleted everything in nv50_display_fini With that change suspend/resume works so I guess the problem is elsewhere.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>