<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_REOPENED " title="REOPENED --- - [nvc1/Quardro1000M|nvc3/Quadro2000M] graphic garbage/corruption/noise on resume" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59168#c43">Comment # 43</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_REOPENED " title="REOPENED --- - [nvc1/Quardro1000M|nvc3/Quadro2000M] graphic garbage/corruption/noise on resume" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59168">bug 59168</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:imirkin@alum.mit.edu" title="Ilia Mirkin <imirkin@alum.mit.edu>"> Ilia Mirkin</a> <pre>(In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=59168#c42">comment #42</a>) > Created <a href="attachment.cgi?id=94996" name="attach_94996" title="Remove NVDEV_ENGINE_COPY1 from GF116 to mirror GF106">attachment 94996</a> <a href="attachment.cgi?id=94996&action=edit" title="Remove NVDEV_ENGINE_COPY1 from GF116 to mirror GF106">[details]</a> > Remove NVDEV_ENGINE_COPY1 from GF116 to mirror GF106 > > Since Michael Weirauch reports this issue has been resolved for his card > (0xc3, according to his dmesg uploads), and the issue remains on Doug > Brunner and my card (0xcf), and that both cards once used the same code-base > and functioned correctly in the Linux 3.4 Kernels, I went on a hunch. > > By changing the 0xc3 definition to 0xcf (forcing my card to be recognized as > a GF106), I was able to reproduce Michael's suspend/resume success with my > own card. > > Having discovered that THAT works, it became a mission to figure out what > was different between the 0xc3 (GF106, working) and 0xcf (GF116, > non-working). > > By removing the declaration of NVDEV_ENGINE_COPY1 from the 0xcf case, as > this patch does, the suspend/resume issue no longer affects my card. > > I have submitted this patch for your review, and sincerely hope it is > accepted. Thanks! Can you check if the issue still occurs with 3.14-rcX (but without your patch)? Some changes were made to better respect the engine disables in register 22500. (Speaking of which, can you grab envytools and do a "nvapeek 22500"... and also 22580)</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>