<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_REOPENED "
title="REOPENED --- - MacBook Pro 5,1 with nVidia 9400m and 9600m, scrambled screen"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58556#c24">Comment # 24</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_REOPENED "
title="REOPENED --- - MacBook Pro 5,1 with nVidia 9400m and 9600m, scrambled screen"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58556">bug 58556</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:pierre.morrow@free.fr" title="Pierre Moreau <pierre.morrow@free.fr>"> <span class="fn">Pierre Moreau</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>Hi Joanand,
My HEAD before applying the patch was commit 34d5950
(<a href="http://cgit.freedesktop.org/nouveau/linux-2.6/commit/?h=drm-nouveau-next&id=34d595081812da62b5357579267c4ab5eae64ac1">http://cgit.freedesktop.org/nouveau/linux-2.6/commit/?h=drm-nouveau-next&id=34d595081812da62b5357579267c4ab5eae64ac1</a>).
The HEAD after the patch is just: 34d5950 + e18833a, nothing more. So I'm
running with both cards enabled.
I tried Ilias' patch (<a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW --- - MacBook Pro 5,x unable to boot [NV96 + NVAC]"
href="show_bug.cgi?id=27501#c27">https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27501#c27</a>)
to test each card alone, and I got:
* NVAC only: corrupted screen (without e18833a) + acceleration not working;
* NV96 only: no corrupted screen (even without e18833a) + acceleration
working.
I wonder why we do have quite different results for the NV96...
Cheers,
Pierre</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>