<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_REOPENED "
title="REOPENED --- - MacBook Pro 5,1 with nVidia 9400m and 9600m, scrambled screen"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58556#c26">Comment # 26</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_REOPENED "
title="REOPENED --- - MacBook Pro 5,1 with nVidia 9400m and 9600m, scrambled screen"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58556">bug 58556</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:pierre.morrow@free.fr" title="Pierre Moreau <pierre.morrow@free.fr>"> <span class="fn">Pierre Moreau</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>Hi Joanand,
Shouldn't the patch for driver/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/bar/nv50.c rather be
+ line 233: int ret, i;
+ line 351: for(i = 0; i < 8; i++)
+ line 352: nv_wr32(priv, 0x001900 + (i * 4), 0x00000000);
By the way, on top of which commit/kernel are you applying the patch?
Yeah, if you try with acceleration you end up with <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW --- - MacBook Pro 5,x unable to boot [NV96 + NVAC]"
href="show_bug.cgi?id=27501">bug 27501</a>
(<a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW --- - MacBook Pro 5,x unable to boot [NV96 + NVAC]"
href="show_bug.cgi?id=27501">https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27501</a>).
EFIFB should not be the problem: it is removed by nouveau at some point, to be
replaced by nouveaufb, which seems to be not rightly configured (or the
accesses to it), bringing screen corruption.
I have a 5,3 (iirc) MacBook Pro (mid 2009) 15.6", with the same graphic cards,
resolution is also 1440x900.
Pierre</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>